Adirondack Base Camp header image

Entries Tagged as 'conservation'

2010 Deer Take and Bear Harvest

March 28th, 2011 · No Comments · News

I’m always interested in the hunting stats when they come out.
Things I noted in the data:

  • 521 Black Bears were harvested in the Adirondacks in 2010.
  • 2010 Calculated NYS Legal Deer Take is 230,100 (a lot of venison)
  • City of Plattsburgh had 8 Bucks Harvested?
  • Big spike in 2003 for a record of 1,370 Adirondack Bears harvested
  • Deer take also peaked around 2003 (what happened in 2003?)
  • St Lawrence is the top county with 97 Bears taken

2010 Adirondack Bear Harvest

“Deer hunters play a crucial role, benefiting all New Yorkers, by helping to maintain deer numbers at levels that are ecologically and socially appropriate, and we appreciate their participation,” Commissioner Martens said.

I guess socially appropriate means those deer are in the wrong place.

Sucks for them

I’m loaded for Beer.

Here are links to the fastest publishers of the two press releases:
Deer season stats released
DEC announces 2010 bear hunting results

Bear - ready to harvest

Tags: ······

Public Invited to Watershed Stewardship Summit in Keene Valley

March 23rd, 2011 · No Comments · Adirondack News

Lake Champlain Basin ProgramThe New York Citizens Advisory Committee to the Lake Champlain Basin Program is inviting the public to a Watershed Stewardship Summit which will present the successes and challenges in aquatic invasive species spread prevention in the Lake Champlain basin and Adirondacks.

The summit will held on Tuesday, March 29, from 1:00 pm to 3:30 pm at The Nature Conservancy Office on Route 73 in Keene Valley.

Aquatic invasive species are an on-going threat to the region’s lakes and rivers. The introduction of a single invasive species into a waterbody has the potential to upset the ecological balance by out-competing native plants, disrupting the food web, and altering species composition. Aquatic invasive species impact the use and enjoyment of waters, as well as, the local economy. Preventing the introduction and spread of aquatic invasive species is critical for protecting our water resources.

Learn from local experts from around the region about programs that are being implemented to help prevent the introduction and spread of aquatic invasive species into our lakes and rivers. The panel of experts will include:

  • Dr. Eric Holmlund, Director of the Watershed Stewardship Program at Paul Smith’s College
  • Lake Champlain Basin Program Boat Launch Steward Program
  • Hilary Smith, Director of the Adirondack Park Invasive Plant Program
  • Carol Treadwell, Ph.D., Executive Director for the Ausable River Association
  • Emily DeBolt, Director of Education for the Lake George Association

The summit is sponsored by the New York Citizens Advisory Committee – Lake Champlain Basin Program. Please rsvp at nycaclcb@gw.dec.state.ny.us by March 25.

Tags: ··

Mercury Standard Will Reverse Damage to NY Lakes

March 17th, 2011 · No Comments · Adirondack News

US EPAThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed mercury standards for power plants are a major step in reversing the contamination of New York’s lakes, particularly in the Adirondacks.

In response to a court-ordered deadline, the EPA has proposed the first-ever national standards for mercury, arsenic and other toxic air pollution from power plants. The new standards would require many power plants to install state-of-the-art pollution control technologies to cut harmful emissions of mercury, arsenic, chromium, nickel and gases that cause acid rain and smog.

“After 20 years of uncertainty, the federal government will now have the authority to regulate these toxic chemicals that have had such a devastating impact on the Adirondacks, Catskills and other natural areas,” said Neil Woodworth, executive director of the Adirondack Mountain Club (ADK). “Because of the technology required to meet this standard, it will not only cut mercury contamination by 91 percent, it will also reduce fine particulate matter, low-level ozone and acidic precipitation.”

1,350 coal and oil-fired units at 525 power plants emitting mercury, arsenic, other toxic metals, acid gases, and organic air toxics including dioxin.

The proposed standard is the result of a 2008 U.S. Court of Appeals decision that threw out EPA’s Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR), a cap-and-trade program that allowed polluters to buy pollution credits and emit mercury without pollution controls. CAMR resulted in regional mercury “hot spots,” and recent studies have linked coal-fired power plants to mercury hot spots in the Adirondacks and Catskills. The appeals court ruled that CAMR conflicted with the clear language of the federal Clean Air Act, which requires each power plant to install the best pollution-control technology available to reduce mercury emissions.

The lawsuit was brought by a coalition of national health and environmental organizations. ADK was the only New York environmental group to participate in the lawsuit.

The Adirondacks and Catskills are downwind of numerous coal-burning power plants, whose mercury emissions contribute significantly to mercury pollution in these regions. A 2007 independent study by the Charles Driscoll and the Hubbard Brook Research Foundation estimated that mercury emissions from U.S. coal-fired power plants are responsible for 40 percent to 65 percent of mercury deposition in the Northeast.

Current levels of mercury deposition in the Northeast are four to six times higher than the levels recorded in 1900. Ninety-six percent of the lakes in the Adirondack region and 40 percent of the lakes in New Hampshire and Vermont exceed the recommended EPA action level for methyl mercury in fish.

Because of high mercury levels in fish from a number of reservoirs in the Catskills, state health officials have warned that infants, children under 15 and women of childbearing age should not eat any fish from these reservoirs. Mercury is also present in two-thirds of Adirondack loons at levels that negatively impact their reproductive capacity, posing a significant risk to their survival.

Tags: ···